 |
conurus smart adapters and lens mount conversions
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Lens-Zero
Joined: 12 Jun 2011 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2011 9:01 pm Post subject: Sony Alpha 900 or Equivalent |
|
|
Since Bo-Ming you already have on hand the Contax-N electronic codes, can you do the same thing to Sony Alpha?
Or, for the sake of the majority Contax-N lens owners, can you develope an external device to control the focusing and aperture rings of Contax N, applicable to Canon EOS, or Sony Alpha, etc. who may take another step to alter ther bayonet mounts. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
conurus Site Admin

Joined: 15 Aug 2006 Posts: 795 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
1, we don't think a conversion from Contax N to Sony A-mount is possible, because the N-mount expects electronic commands to control the aperture, but the A-mount controls the aperture with a mechanical lever.
2, all Contax N lenses converted by us are capable of aperture control using the lens' own aperture ring without a Canon camera body. The only requirement is a power source for the lens. See this thread for details.
http://support.conurus.com/viewtopic.php?t=720 _________________ I am a bird and I uncovered the E, EF and N-mount communication protocols! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Lens-Zero
Joined: 12 Jun 2011 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
conurus wrote: | 1, we don't think a conversion from Contax N to Sony A-mount is possible, because the N-mount expects electronic commands to control the aperture, but the A-mount controls the aperture with a mechanical lever.
2, all Contax N lenses converted by us are capable of aperture control using the lens' own aperture ring without a Canon camera body. The only requirement is a power source for the lens. See this thread for details.
http://support.conurus.com/viewtopic.php?t=720 |
By suggesting an "external device" I meant something like a "ring flash" to wrap around the lens neck. I can see that there is something like 4mm between the aperture ring and flange ring, and there would be another 3.4mm (for Sony A) and 4.0mm for Canon EOS, enough thickness for a mini cell phone battery or lighter battery, or a number of button cells underneath. Thus letting the lens independant from the camera commands per se, on aperture and focusing. I will be very happy to see this to happer soon. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
ManWearPants
Joined: 18 Feb 2010 Posts: 74
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
conurus Site Admin

Joined: 15 Aug 2006 Posts: 795 Location: Vancouver, Canada
|
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2013 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is also significant overlap between ZA and Contax N. For instance, we have ZA 16-35/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 50/1.4 and 85/1.4. Sony A-mount users seem to be very well served by ZA, with AF, AE and sensor-based image stabilization. Lens conversions are costly so there is no chance Contax N will be able to compete with ZA lenses on Sony A-mount cameras.
Regarding lens adapters with auxiliary aperture diaphragms, I would like to point out that lens designers took great effort to decide where to put the aperture diaphragm. It cannot be placed arbitrarily anywhere without impacting optical performance. Some lenses were reported to work well with auxiliary aperture adapters such as the one you cited, but some other lenses had problems with vignetting or strange bokeh. _________________ I am a bird and I uncovered the E, EF and N-mount communication protocols! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
|